Franchises Challenge B CCI’s Controversial New RTM Rules Ahead of IPL Auction

Franchises Challenge B CCI’s Controversial New RTM Rules Ahead of IPL Auction

As the Indian Premier League (IPL) prepares for its 2025 auction, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) faces pushback from franchises over the reintroduction of the Right to Match (RTM) rule. The revised rule allows the highest bidder a second chance to increase their offer before the team holding the RTM card can match it, raising concerns among franchises about its impact on team strategies and player retention.

Several franchises have voiced their concerns over the recent modifications to the Right to Match (RTM) process in the Indian Premier League (IPL), particularly regarding the additional advantages granted to the highest bidder. These franchises argue that the new rule, which allows the highest bidder to raise their bid before the entitled team exercises the RTM, undermines the fundamental purpose and logic of the RTM system.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) recently announced changes to the IPL’s retention rules, including the provision that the highest bidder would be given an extra opportunity to increase their bid for a player before the RTM is exercised. The enhanced bid amount can be of any value, which the team holding the RTM must match.

The BCCI has declared that each franchise can exercise the RTM option up to six times, including one for an uncapped player, at the auction. However, this new rule has led some franchises to question the system’s fairness and practicality, as it may discourage player retention and significantly impact their overall auction strategy.

As the IPL’s governing body considers the feedback from these franchises, it remains to be seen how the BCCI will respond to the concerns raised and whether any adjustments will be made to the new RTM rules. The outcome of this dispute could have substantial implications for the upcoming IPL auction, potentially reshaping the league’s future direction and the strategies of the franchises involved.

The BCCI further clarifies the rule by providing an illustrative example. According to the board, if Team 1 holds the Right to Match (RTM) for Player X and Team 2 places the highest bid of Rs. 6 crore, Team 1 will be given the first opportunity to exercise their RTM. Should Team 1 choose to do so, Team 2 can increase their bid. If Team 2 decides to raise their bid to Rs. 9 crore, Team 1 can then exercise the RTM and secure Player X for Rs. 9 crore. On the other hand, if Team 2 decides not to raise their bid and maintains it at Rs. 6 crore, Team 1 can still exercise the RTM and acquire Player X for the initial bid amount of Rs. 6 crore.

This detailed explanation aims to clarify the revised RTM process and how it may impact the dynamics of the player auction at the Indian Premier League (IPL). As franchises continue to express their concerns over the new rule, the BCCI’s response and any potential adjustments to the RTM system will play a crucial role in shaping the outcome of the upcoming IPL auction and the league’s future direction.

As clarified by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the increased bid amount can be of any value, which diminishes the significance of the incremental bid at that stage. This has led some franchises to formally write to the BCCI, expressing their concerns and questioning the new clause, while others have engaged in discussions with its officials.

Cricbuzz can confirm these interactions between the franchises and the BCCI as the IPL’s stakeholders navigate the implications of the revised RTM rules. As the situation develops, the BCCI’s response and any potential adjustments to the RTM system will play a crucial role in shaping the outcome of the upcoming IPL auction and the league’s future direction.

Concerns have been raised that the new Right to Match (RTM) clause introduced by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) may contradict the organization’s primary objective of attracting more star players to the auction. By setting INR 18 crore and INR 14 crore for players ranked No. 4 and No. 5 retentions, the BCCI is discouraging franchises from retaining players. Critics argue that this new RTM clause needs to align with this strategy, as franchises may now opt for more retentions instead of using the RTM option.

Furthermore, adding a “maximum fee” for overseas players at mini-auctions could significantly impact the auction’s dynamics. With the fee being the lower figure between the highest retention price and the highest auction price at the mega auction, there is concern that this rule change may limit the earning potential of international players.

Give your favorite player a boost! Visit our site to show how much you believe in them.

Check out more related topics: Bangladesh Cricket: Navigating a New Era Beyond Shakib Al Hasan

Recent Blogs

24KBET Games